Trump Renames the “GULF OF AMERICA”

Announced from his Mar-a-Lago resort just days after his return to the White House, Trump signed an executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. He said it’s a symbolic step toward “reclaiming American pride.” 

While some conservatives have embraced the move as a bold assertion of U.S. sovereignty, others—especially in Mexico and among environmentalists—see it as unnecessary, politically charged, and potentially damaging.

What’s Behind the Name Change? 

The renaming of the Gulf is reportedly part of a broader push by the Trump administration to back U.S. interests.

Google Maps announced it would update the name for U.S. users in compliance with the executive order.

Meanwhile, the Associated Press (AP) has refused to adopt “Gulf of America,” a decision that led to tensions between the White House and the media giant.

AP vs. Trump

On February 11, the Associated Press reported that one of its journalists was barred from an Oval Office event after the organization refused to use the new name. According to sources, the White House warned AP that failing to comply with the executive order would lead to restricted access to presidential events.

Supporters of AP argue that the White House should not dictate editorial choices, while Trump’s backers claim the press is deliberately undermining his administration.

Does This Have Environmental or Political Implications?

While the renaming itself doesn’t immediately change policy, many believe it could signal a shift in environmental regulations in the region. The Gulf of Mexico has long been a hub for oil drilling, and past Republican administrations have pushed for expanded energy production. Some speculate that by rebranding the Gulf, Trump is laying the groundwork for more aggressive offshore drilling policies.

On the international front, Mexico and other Gulf-bordering nations have criticized the change, calling it dismissive of history and sovereignty. Given that the Gulf is a shared body of water, some wonder whether this could lead to diplomatic tensions.

Public Reaction

The AP White House ban has fueled online debates over press freedom, while many argue that media outlets should respect executive orders.

What do you think? Is the ban justified?